UFC 1 - starring Bill “Superfoot” Wallace

Oh man, I just watched an old video of the very first UFC competition: “UFC 1: The Beginning.” What a classic! If you haven’t seen it, I’d highly encourage you to find it out in the wide world of webs (here), or acquire the dvd - you won’t regret it. The fighting is pretty laughable by today’s brutal standards, but the commentary has survived the test of time as quite probably the worst ever. Bill “Superfoot” Wallace, a kickboxing/tae kwon do/karate champion; Kathy Long, a lady kickboxing champion; and NFL legend Jim Brown set the tone for a hilarious night in the octogon. Kathy Long actually comes up with a few decent things to say, but Bill insists on interrupting her or contradicting anything that comes out of her mouth. Jim Brown keeps his mouth shut for the most part, but slips in a few zings in response to Bill’s ridiculous statements. This video sums up the hilarity that ensues with Bill Wallace at the mic: Tribute to Bill Wallace

I guess he forgot to rehearse his lines, learn how to pronounce the fighter’s names, learn the names of his fellow commentators/announcers, or learn the name of the league. Bill, don’t quit your day job, you suck.

As for the actual fighting, highlights include:

  • Gerard Gordeau heiling Hitler before the fight.  Just kidding - apparently his pre-fight routine is the “Savate Salute” not the Heil Hitler salute.  Sorry Gerard, no offense intended, but you definitely looked the part…
  • Gerard Gordeau kicking blubbery Teila Tuli in the mouth, extracting a tooth
  • Kevin Rosier’s too-tight shorts - couldn’t he have worn baggier pants?  Jean shorts might have been a better choice
  • Art Jimmerson’s single boxing glove
  • Art Jimmerson tapping out for no apparent reason
  • Royce Gracie beating everyone

I’m famous! (and humbled…)

My good friend Chadwick Shoults just posted a kayaking video from our recent trip to Deckers/Waterton Canyon, near Conifer, CO.  It was a great video documenting all the drops on this short, but furious III+/IV- run, and somehow a popular kayaking website eddyflower.com saw it and decided to post it as a video guide for Waterton!  Although, as for being a run guide, try not to do what I did - e.g. get flipped three times (one not seen in the video, and one more almost-flip), all at inopportune times.  It was a fun, but challenging and humbling experience.  It is good to be reminded that I’m really not that great, so I don’t go off and try something stupid.  Here’s the video:

http://eddyflower.com/RunDetail.aspx?RunId=76

The Web of the 90s (Web0.9beta)

I just read an article: “RIP Web Trends of the 90s,” and it reminded me how much I miss the earlier days of the wide world of webs. (Not really…) I’m talking about the 90s web; the days of old when Prodigy and AOL ruled like kings, and Geocities and Tripod hosted pretty much every personal site, free of charge. These were the days of yore when PCs were a creamy beige in color, and still had that nice 5 ¼ inch floppy drive, which would allow you to store away up to 5 of your favorite animated gifs for future viewing.

Here are a few of the web trends from that great era (some of these are repeats from the article above, but they’re classics, so I thought they were worth reiterating):

  • Animated gifs (as mentioned before) – who could forget that explosion gif featured on the nearly every heavy metal fan page, or that fist gif that was continuously punching its way out of the page? I also like the “Under Construction” banner that everyone used, and the little construction guy, tirelessly working away to finish construction on your Metallica web-ring page (hosted on geocities of course).
  • Webrings – speaking of webrings, what ever happened to those? I guess now that we have these search engines, it’s no longer useful to insert your site into a ring of links.
  • “Best Viewed With” links to Netscape or Internet Explorer. I guess these were probably valid back then – pages probably looked quite a bit different in those old browsers. Interestingly enough, this “Best Viewed With” nonsense went out of style for awhile, but now smug Firefox users are trying to bring it back in an attempt to usurp the dominance of Internet Explorer.
  • MIDI music – before mp3s assumed their rightful place as king of all things downloadable, I remember scouring the web for MIDI interpretations of my favorite songs. These, along with your collection of animated gifs, could be conveniently stored on floppy disk for future listening pleasure.
  • Modem sounds – I have a friend whose cell phone ringer is a recording of the beeps and hissing of an old modem dialing up to the net. I think that’s pretty funny. Now that I think about it, having to dial-up to the internet seems way old, but it wasn’t really that long ago.
  • Hit Counters – on my very first webpage, I felt compelled to include one of those odometer-style hit counters at the bottom of the page (a must for any 90s website). I quickly discovered that I could grant myself instant web credibility by clicking the browser’s refresh button over-and-over in a rapid fashion.
  • <marquee> or <blink> text – The telltale sign of a true 90s website is blinking or scrolling text. Often appearing in the vicinity of a glittery panda gif, colorful rainbow dots, or a barb-wire horizontal divider, the blinking and/or scrolling text adds just the right amount of class to any Web1.0 site.

I guess that about does it, feel free to comment with your favorite Web1.0 (or Web0.9beta if you prefer) trend.

Metallica Rankings

I recently put up some rankings of the Led Zeppelin studio albums, so I thought I’d stick with that theme and do a few more! Here is my ranking of Metallica albums, with the three best, and one “worst” song on each album:

1. “…And Justice For All” – This is my favorite Metallica album. Apparently this one pretty much killed the band’s mojo; they haven’t been able to live up to it since. In my opinion, it’s got some of the best riffage, instrumental breaks and solos of any of their albums. Everything on this album is so meticulously done – it must have been a pretty stressful recording session, especially for certain unnamed band members.

Best Songs:

  • “One” – this actually isn’t my favorite song on the album, but I think it’s a really good, definitive song for Metallica. It is a fine example of their “start slow and melodic and build up to a crushing end” style of song writing. I was tempted to put “Blackend” here…
  • “Blackened” – this is a great song
  • Tie: “And Justice For All”/”Dyers Eve” – “And Justice” is a great song – my only complaint is that it gets a little unnecessarily repetitive near the end. “Dyers Eve” is another good one – I guess they refused to play it live for a long time because it was so taxing on that pipsqueak Lars, which is kind of cool.

Worst Songs:

  • I can’t seem to pick the “worst” song on this album. At first glance I might pick “The Frayed Ends of Sanity” or “The Shortest Straw,” but those two songs are awesome. I’ll just leave this blank for now…

2. “Ride the Lightning” – This is a controversial pick – this means that “Master of Puppets” falls to #3, which is no good. I guess the reason that I put “Ride the Lightning” at #2 is because I’ve just listened to it more. “Ride the Lighting” is a little rough around the edges, but it has some awesome songs on it.

Best Songs:

  • “Ride the Lightning” – I think this song has some of the best overall riffage and section transitions of any of their earlier songs.
  • “Creeping Death” – this one is a classic, it’s probably one of their signature songs
  • Tie: “Fade to Black”/”Call of Ktulu” – “Fade to Black” was considered to be a sell-out for them at the time, I think it was their first attempt at more melodic, acoustic songwriting, but it’s a pretty influential song. “Call of Ktulu” is a complete classic as well, the triple-layer harmony part at the end rocks my face.

Worst Song:

  • “Escape” – I like “Escape,” but it might be the least memorable song on the album. “Trapped Under Ice” barely made the cut for worst song – the lyrics are pretty cheesy, but it has some good instrumental work

3. “Master of Puppets” – A lot of people put this one at #1, and it would definitely deserve the #1 spot. I would probably deserve to be berated about this pick, and even about some of my song picks below…

Best Songs:

  • Tie: “Master of Puppets”/”Battery” – “Master of Puppets” is the signature track on this album, and I think “Battery” has been pretty influential on the thrashy metal bands out today.
  • “Orion” – This is one of my favorite Metallica songs on any album. It has some interesting riffs and solos and a melodic waltz section in the middle, which is awesome.
  • Tie: “Welcome Home (Sanitarium)”/”Disposable Heroes” – “Sanitarium” is comparable to “Fade to Black,” I would say. I think the galloping guitars on “Disposable Heroes” has influenced a lot of the metal bands today.

Worst Song:

  • “The Thing That Should Not Be” – A good song, but it feels like it might be the weakest track. A tad bit of repetitiveness might be my only complaint.

4. “Metallica” aka “The Black Album” – this was a tough pick, I almost wanted to put “Kill Em All” here, just because the “Black Album” was the beginning of the end for Metallica. I felt obligated to put this here though – it has some of Metallica’s most memorable songs. On the downside, some of the lyrics on this album really make me cringe (“Holier than Thou…”)

Best Songs:

  • “Enter Sandman” – this one is a little over-exposed, and doesn’t have the speed riffage that everyone wants, but it’s a very good song.
  • Tie: “Sad But True”/”Wherever I May Roam”/”Don’t Tread On Me” – “Sad But True” might be one of their heaviest slow songs. The other two are good songs as well.
  • “The Unforgiven” – This is another one like “Fade To Black” or “Sanitarium,” and it’s pretty good too
  • (Honorable Mention) “Nothing Else Matters” – A lot of the noobs would list this #1, but not me. It is a good song, but it’s kind of disappointing at the same time – they just strayed too far from the crushing metal that everyone wants.

Worst Song:

  • “The Struggle Within” – This song has such an awesome intro with the snare drum army, but once the lyrics come in, I can’t stand it.

5. “Kill Em All” – this one definitely doesn’t deserve to fall all the way to #5, but I guess that’s just how it goes sometimes.   Overall, it’s a classic album, but I don’t think I would put it above picks 1-3, and I gave the Black Album the edge for its overall popularity and seeming inflluence.

Best Songs:

  • “The Four Horsemen” – this one is pretty epic, and I think give some foreshadowing of the epics to come on later albums
  • Tie: “Hit the Lights”/”Jump in the Fire” – two good songs
  • Tie: “Whiplash”/”No Remorse” – two more good songs

Worst Song:

  • “(Anesthesia) Pulling Teeth” – this is a pretty notable song – it’s basically a bass solo with some crazy playing and some interesting sounds, but it’s just a little rough. He does say “Bass solo, take one” at the beginning of the track, so that explains the roughness. An impressive song, but I usually skip over it, to be honest…

6. “Load” – The disappointing album to follow the Black Album. It actually has some decent riffs, but they’re more in the vein of adult alternative rock rather than heavy metal.

Best Songs:

  • “Bleeding Me” – this song actually rocks pretty well, it’s almost a throwback to the earlier days, but not quite.
  • “2×4” – a noobish pick, but I think it’s one of the better songs on this album
  • “Until It Sleeps” – a decent song – there might be a better one, but I don’t really care. A lot of the other songs have some good potential, but each one fails to rise above mediocrity

Worst Song:

  • “Mama Said” – blech – get rid of it. I know they wanted to branch out, but this is no good.

7. “ReLoad” – they should have just released “Load” and “ReLoad” in a package deal so people wouldn’t have to be disappointed twice. I must admit I haven’t give ReLoad a ton of listening time, so this might be off…

Best Songs:

  • “Devil’s Dance” – I had to pick something… not a bad song
  • “Unforgiven II” – not a terribly original song, but I think it’s pretty well-done, it’s not one I would usually skip
  • (I haven’t listened to ReLoad enough to pick a #3)

Worst Song:

  • “Fuel” – please, don’t do anything like this again. Just kidding, this song isn’t that bad, it’s actually probably one of the best tracks on the album, but I just don’t like the main lyric: “Gimme Fuel, Gimme Fire, Gimme that which I desire.” Not so sure about that…

8. St. Anger” – Listening to this the first time was probably one of the most disappointing experiences in my life. I really can’t rank the songs, I don’t think I’ve heard most of them more than twice, but they all sound the same, as far as I can tell – muddy, clonky guitars and terrible lyrics. How could they go from such awesome guitar playing and arranging in “Master of Puppets” and “And Justice for All” to this muddy mess? The drumming sounds like Lars is just banging on 55 gallon drums. Maybe it was Bob Rock’s doing – I’m glad they got rid of him. I really hope they make a U-turn for the next album – rumor has it that they’re going to try to return to their roots, but I’m not getting my hopes up.

Best Songs:

  • “Invisible Kid” – this song actually has some decent riffage, but the lyrics suck really bad
  • I don’t know, I can’t finish this

Worst Song:

  • St. Anger” – Awful! So many different completely disjoint sections, and some of the worst lyrics I’ve ever heard. The verses are terrible… The main riff is alright, but the rest of the song blows.

Led Zeppelin Rankings

In this controversial blog, I will rank the Led Zeppelin albums in order of best to worst, and for each album, I will state the 3 best songs, along with the worst song on the album. “Worst” doesn’t always mean it’s a bad song, it’s just the weakest song on the album. Here is the list:

1. “Led Zeppelin” aka “I” - This was a hard choice for the #1 spot, but I think this album best shows Led Zeppelin’s blues influences, and for being a “debut” album, it’s pretty notable

Best Songs:

  • “Babe I’m Gonna Leave You”
  • “Your Time is Gonna Come”
  • Tie: “Black Mountainside”/”Dazed and Confused” (”Dazed” isn’t my favorite, but it’s a pretty interesting, possibly “ground-breaking” (or at least noteworthy) song)

Worst Song:

  • “Communication Breakdown” - this was a tough choice, but I think this is just my least favorite song on the album.  The main guitar part is a little bland, and I actually like the bluesy songs on the album more than this particular one.

2. “II” - An even tougher choice. I felt that “II” probably has the most recognizable Led Zeppelin songs of any of their albums, so I felt obligated to put it at #2. The songs on “II” might not be as “mature” as some of their later work, but it’s hard to deny the deserved success of this album.

Best Songs:

  • “Ramble On” - maybe a controversial pick for #1, but I like this song
  • “What is and What Should Never Be”
  • “Heartbreaker” - This song features one of Jimmy Page’s most recognizable guitar riffs and solos

Worst Song:

  • “Whole Lotta Love” - Apparently this song was insanely popular, but I’m not a big fan. The guitar solo is pretty good, but the rest is nothing special.

3. “Physical Graffiti” - I think this album might represent the peak of Led Zeppelin’s creativity.

Best Songs:

  • “Ten Years Gone” - I think this is one of their best songs
  • Kashmir” - Not really my favorite song - it’s a little repetitive, but it’s pretty unique, and could be considered one of their “signature” songs
  • “Down By The Seaside” - I think this song is great, it just makes you feel like you’re down by the seaside
  • (Honorable Mention) “The Rover” - This song is also a favorite of mine, it’s probably not one of their most marketable songs, but it’s got a couple pretty different sections and a decent little jam at the end

Worst Song:

  • “Black Country Woman” - Not a bad song for what it’s worth, but probably the weakest song on the album

4. “IV” - A great album, but maybe a little too short, and a little over-exposed

Best Songs

  • “Stairway to Heaven” - Probably their biggest song ever
  • “When the Levee Breaks” - An awesome drum sound, combined with a very fitting, droning guitar/harmonica combo
  • Tie: “Black Dog” and “Rock and Roll” - I actually like “Rock and Roll” a lot more than “Black Dog,” but I felt obligated to put them both here, because they were both pretty big hits. I think “Black Dog” suffers a little from over-exposure, but its still a good rock song.

Worst Song:

  • “Misty Mountain Hop” - I actually like this song, but it’s a little simplistic. I couldn’t justify putting “Going to California” or “Battle of Evermore” here, I’d actually rather listen to either of these over “Misty Mountain Hop.”

5. “Houses of the Holy” - A great album that might deserve to go above “IV,” but “Stairway” gives “IV” the edge.

Best Songs:

  • “Over the Hills and Far Away” - One of my favorite Led Zeppelin “acoustic” songs
  • Tie: “The Song Remains the Same”/”The Ocean”/”The Rain Song” - I think “The Song Remains the Same” and “The Rain Song” two of their most creative, some might say “mature” songs. “The Ocean” is one of their best straight-up rock songs.
  • Tie: “D’yer Mak’er”/”Dancing Days” - “D’yer” is not necessarily one of my favorites, but it’s a pretty unique one for Led Zeppelin. I gave the nod to “Dancing Days” too, because I felt like it should make it on the top list - I wouldn’t feel right if “D’yer” had sole possession of the #3 slot.

Worst Song:

  • “The Crunge” - this song actually has a pretty good groove to it; it’s pretty funky, but the synthesizer part, while pretty cool, reminds me too much of some of the less desirable songs that Led Zeppelin would release on later albums.  (“Carouselambra…”)

6. “III” - I’m actually a big fan of “III” aka “the acoustic album,” but it kept getting bumped down the list by some really strong albums.

Best Songs:

  • Tie: “Gallows Pole”/”Tangerine” - “Gallows Pole” has a good buildup and some good transitions, and “Tangerine” is one of their best acoustic tracks, with some memorable lap slide guitar.
  • Tie: “Friends”/”That’s the Way” - These songs somewhat comparable, but they each have a pretty different feel.  I might say I like “Friends” a little better…
  • “Bron Yr Aur Stomp” - this is an awesome acoustic jam, it makes you want to snap your fingers or tap your feet

Worst Song:

  • “Hats Off to Roy Harper” - this is one of my least favorite Led Zeppelin songs. This was probably done on purpose, but the acoustic guitar is pretty rough on the ears, and it sounds like Robert Plant is singing through a bull horn

7. “Presence” - #7 and #8 were a toss-up between “Presence” and “In Through the Out Door,” but I gave the edge to “Presence.” I think “Presence” has some pretty good complimentary guitar and bass playing throughout; it’s interesting to listen to, at least.

Best Songs:

  • “Achilles Last Stand” - this is a great rock song, it’s got a driving verse, and some good instrumental breaks throughout
  • “Nobody’s Fault But Mine” - this was a hard pick, there are some pretty good “campy” songs on this album, but I think this one is probably more marketable or memorable
  • “For Your Life” - I like this song, it’s not their greatest work, but it’s pretty good

Worst Song:

  • “Candy Store Rock” - not the most inspired lyrics I’ve ever heard – I probably wouldn’t take the time to slog through this one too often

8. “In Through the Out Door” - the last official Led Zeppelin studio album actually has some pretty good songs, but the creative juices have seemingly started to dry up by this point.

Best Songs:

  • “All My Love” - A tad bit bland, but I understand that it was inspired by the death of Robert Plant’s son, so I’ll give it the #1 spot. It sort of feels like Plant’s heart just isn’t fully in it anymore, or at least at this point, which is completely understandable.
  • “Hot Dog” - I actually love this song, it’s one of the campiest songs they ever did, but it’s quality
  • Tie: “In the Evening”/”Fool In the Rain” - “In The Evening” is a decent song, and one of the more popular ones on this album, I suppose. “Fool In the Rain” is pretty cheesy, but it is a pretty well-done pop rock song, I bet most people would recognize it.

Worst Song:

  • “Carouselambra” - Not a completely terrible song, but the synthesizers are pretty over-done and kind of annoying

9. “Coda” - This album was released after the band broke up. It’s basically a collection of songs that didn’t make the cut on other albums, maybe for good reason. However, in the Led Zeppelin complete studio recordings boxed set, this disc has 3 truly awesome songs tacked on as bonus tracks. I’ll cop out and ignore the original release and just go with the bonus tracks…

Best Songs:

  • “Travelling Riverside Blues” - this is actually one of my favorite Led Zeppelin songs
  • “Hey Hey What Can I Do” - it’s a shame this song didn’t make it on one of the other albums, it’s a great song
  • “White Summer/Black Mountainside Medley” - I think the White Summer section has some of Jimmy Page’s most interesting “non-traditional” guitar playing, and it seamlessly transitions into “Black Mountainside” at the end, which is pretty cool

Worst Song:

  • “Ozone Baby” - not terrible, but it’s definitely not that great either. It’s also one of the worst song names they came up with…

Well, I guess that wraps it up, feel free to berate me with criticism (assuming anyone actually reads this…)

 

Guitar Tab Software - “Powertab” vs. “Guitar Pro”

If you play guitar, and you’re a little bit lazy like me, you’ve probably been exposed to guitar tabs at one point or another. If you haven’t been exposed, a guitar tab is basically a transcription of guitar music that displays the music notes as fret numbers on the individual strings, rather than on the standard musical staff. If you’re not great at reading music, looking at numbers on strings can be way easier than sight-reading a real music transcription. The real guitar purists probably despise tabbing, because it seemingly dumbs things way, way down, and discourages people from learning to read music, but I think it’s great if you just want to learn a song, and don’t really care to better yourself as a “musicologist.” Plus, a lot of rock and jazz guitar is based on scales that fit into movable fretboard patterns, so you can actually become a great player without ever really learning how to read real music.

I don’t know who originally came up with the idea of “tabbing” guitar music, but my first exposure to it was in guitar magazines like “Guitar,” “Guitar World,” and “Guitar One.” These magazines always had 5 or 6 different songs tabbed out at the end. After using these for awhile, I discovered that people had started posting guitar tabs as simple text files on the internet, which was awesome, because you could lookup the tab to pretty much any song you could imagine. Two good sites back then were Harmony Central and Wholenote.  Harmony Central used to have a huge archive of tabs, but they have been literally torn apart by copyright suits from the record companies (or whoever), so their tab section is pretty much useless now.

The next big movement in internet guitar tabbing was “play-along” midi-based tab files that required an external application to read.   The two big “competitors” in this movement are “Powertab” and “Guitar Pro.”  These are both applications that you can download (one is free, one is frickin’ expensive).  There are several good sites out there that host archives of tabs. The best one I’ve found is Ultimate-Guitar, but there are several other decent ones, including, 911-Tabs, powertabs.net. On the other hand, there are tons of really bad sites out there, and tons of really bad tabs too, so sometimes it can be hard to find exactly what you’re looking for. Lately, the MPA has been really cracking down on a lot of these sites because of alleged copyright infringment, but I think that’s a bunch of BS - the vast majority of tabs are created by people sitting down and figuring out songs.  There are probably some tabs out there that people simply type in from existing transcriptions, but I really think it’s arguable whether this is infringing on a music copyright. It’s not like the artists release “official” transcriptions to their music, so how can you claim that any transcription infringes a copyright.

Anyway, this post was supposed to be about Powertab vs. Guitar Pro, so on to that. Powertab is a free application that you can download to read .ptb tab files. You can edit the tabs on the fly, or create new ones using the application, but the editing is pretty tedious. The tab is tied into a midi playback “engine,” which is the best feature. If you have a good .ptb file, the midi-playback and the moving “note-marker” make it really easy to learn a new song, or learn a complicated section of any song.  You can slow the playback down, and it also has the ability to change the tuning of the midi-playback, in case you have a .ptb file that’s tuned down, but you don’t want to retune your guitar. Overall, Powertab has it’s quirks, and can be kind of a pain to work with if you need to use “advanced” features, but the play-along features are really intuitive and pretty good.

Guitar Pro is the other major application in this “market.” I think it was written by a French or German company, and it costs $59 to download! It has a lot of the same features as Powertab, but it also has a feature they call the “Realisitic Sound Engine.” Rather than the bare-bones midi, the RSE is supposed to use a more advanced sound library that will sound a lot more like a real guitar.  It also supports adding midi drum tracks to the playback, which I’m not sure if Powertab can do (although you might be able to fake something out with different midi instruments). I’ve actually tried Guitar Pro with the RSE, and I found that it’s actually pretty useless. The RSE playback does sound better, but it has this weird delay that only sounds right if you turn off the metronome. One problem with this delay has to do with the note-marker in Guitar Pro. When you play a track in Powertab, the notes are highlighted in red as the music scrolls by, which makes it easy to watch and hear the timing of the music.  In Guitar Pro, as the track plays, only the current measure is marked, so it can be hard to follow when the track has to scroll to the next page. With the weird RSE delay, it’s even harder to follow the track as it’s playing. Overall, Guitar Pro might be slightly more user friendly for editing tabs, but the playback in Powertab is much better in my opinion. I would definitely discourage anyone from forking over the $59 for Guitar Pro, I don’t think it’s anywhere near worth-it when the arguably better Powertab is free.

One other thing to note is the availability of .ptb files vs. .gp* (Guitar Pro) files. There seem to be a lot more Guitar Pro files out there, but I’ve found that most of the good Guitar Pro tabs are actually exact copies of the good .ptb files. I don’t know if these corresponding .ptb files were simply exported from Guitar Pro, but in the end, I’ve only found a few good Guitar Pro files that weren’t available in .ptb format.  Don’t be fooled by the greater number of Guitar Pro files, a lot of them are just crap. (A lot of .ptb files are crap too, but at least it’s free crap.)

Anyway, that’s enough of that, my final conclusion is this: use Powertab and don’t support greedy Guitar Pro.

EMG Pickup Installation in a Gibson Explorer (part 5)

I finally got everything totally dismantled, which meant that it was time to undertake the job of putting it back together with all new parts. I must have gotten a little lazy during this, I forgot to take pictures along the way. I think the first thing I did was connect the new pots using the provided washers and nuts. I then connected all the controls together with ground wires. The metal casing of all the pots gets soldered to ground, which was a little bit of a pain. Because the solder only bonds if you heat up the metal quite a bit, it takes some time for the whole pot casing to heat up enough to bond with the solder. It was kind of scary holding the soldering iron on the parts for so long, but it seems to have worked okay. Next, I routed the new pickup wires in from the pickup cavity and soldered them to the volume controls. After that, I made all the toggle switch connections, and then finally the output jack connections, along with the battery connector. It all seemed a little bit too easy, and I was sure I had done something wrong, but I wouldn’t be able to tell until after a few more steps. Here’s a pic with the progress so far:

New controls installed

I wasn’t sure how well the battery would fit in this little cavity, and I was right, it doesn’t fit. At the moment, I have it taped on the back of the guitar, but I’m hoping another little side project will permanently move the battery away from the guitar…

Here’s a picture of the top of the guitar:

New cables routed

At this point, everything was in place, all I had to do was cleanup all the wires and screw in all the screws to get it all put back-together. Here’s a pic of the final product:

Finished

I got it all put back together, and was amazed to find that it worked! It took me a minute to figure out the mono vs. stereo cable problem, but after that, it was all good. It does sound pretty good, it’s not drastically different, but you can definitely tell the difference before and after. The lows and highs are definitely more pronounced, and I’ve had to adjust some of my sloppy techniques because the pickups are a little more responsive.

Here’s one more pic:

Another finished pic

Thanks for reading this, and if you’re doing this yourself, I hope these posts might give you some good tips.

EMG Pickup Installation in a Gibson Explorer (part 4)

At this point, I’d done enough reading and looking at things to feel decently confident to go forward. I must admit that I took these crappy pictures partly to have something to refer to if I screwed something up and had to go back, but luckily I got through it okay.

I’ll start this post with a little info about the output jack. The standard output jack of a guitar is a mono 1/4 inch Tip-Sleeve (TS) female jack. The guitar cable has a TS male plug, where the signal travels on the Tip conductor, and the ground sits on the Sleeve conductor. The amplifier provides the ultimate ground reference for the guitar via the sleeve conductor of the cable. All the electronics in the guitar are grounded to the same reference provided by the amp. That said, the EMG pickups actually require a 9V battery, which they apparently don’t want to “ground” to the guitar’s signal ground. For this reason, the EMG pickups require a stereo Tip-Ring-Sleeve jack so that you can separate the signal and power grounds. Here’s the diagram from the instructions:

EMG wiring diagram

As you can see, the battery’s (-) post goes to the ring connector of the jack. This was kind of strange to me, I couldn’t completely understand why you couldn’t just ground the battery with the other signal ground, which brought me to the next question: how exactly does the battery get grounded? If you use a stereo TRS cable with the TRS jack, the ring serves as the battery ground and the sleeve is the signal ground, but when you plug the cable into the amp, does the amp’s jack have separate contacts for the ring and sleeve? I didn’t think so - my amp only has one speaker, so I couldn’t see why it would have a stereo input jack. If the amp had a mono jack (no contact for the ring of the plug), how does the battery get grounded, or does the battery voltage just float with no real ground? After I got the guitar all put together with EMGs, I discovered the answer. I tried using a stereo TRS cable to plug the guitar into the amp, because I thought there might be some reason to separate the grounds, but I found that this did not produce anything but noise from the guitar. I then tried plugging a mono TS cable into the stereo guitar jack/mono amp jack and the guitar worked perfectly… With this setup, the ring and sleeve connectors on the guitar jack are effectively grounded together on the sleeve of the cable, so I’m not sure why they separate the battery and signal grounds on the output jack. Maybe the idea is to push the ground connection as far away from the electronics as possible, I’m not sure. Anyway, this debacle actually gave me a good idea of something to try - an external power source for the pickups, which would mean you’d never have to replace the battery. I haven’t tried my idea yet, but I’ll write a post later.

Here’s a picture of the old mono jack, pulled out from the guitar:

Old mono jack

After trying to figure all that out, I finally started to de-solder all the controls. Here’s a picture about halfway through the process of removing things:

Halfway taken apart

One thing worth mentioning is the removal of the knobs from the controls. The knobs on this guitar were stuck on the pots pretty well, I couldn’t seem to pull them off without making my fingers bleed. I read a tip on the internet that said you can easily remove the knobs if you wrap an old t-shirt around the knob, and then pull up to get the knob off. I tried that, and it worked pretty well.

I finally got all the old crap taken out, here’s a pic:

Old pickups removed

Here’s a pic of the empty control cavity, the only things left are the toggle switch cable and the string ground wire.

Old controls removed

That’s enough for this post, more to come.

EMG Pickup Installation in a Gibson Explorer (part 3)

EMG pickups require you to replace most of the electronics in the guitar, including most of the wires, the volume and tone potentiometers (”pots”), and the output jack. At this stage in the process, you basically rip out every part of the guitar, and replace it all with the shiny, brand-new, American-made EMG parts! America rules!

A potentiometer is basically a three-terminal variable resistor. Because there are three terminals, there are several different ways to wire it up. I must admit, in my original posting of this blog, I described how I thought it worked in a guitar, but I was dead wrong, so I have edited this post… Of course, I could still be wrong, but I just don’t have a huge desire to draw out the circuit diagrams and try to figure it all out completely, so please correct me if I’m wrong.

In a three-terminal pot, the two outside terminals are connected to each end of the internal resistor, and the middle terminal is tied to a sweeper that can be rotated to contact any point along the internal resistor. If you were so inclined to connect a signal path from one of the outer terminals to the center terminal (and leave the other terminal floating), you’ll basically just have a two-terminal variable resistor.

In a guitar, the volume pots work as a parallel “bleeding” resistor on the signal path. The signal current enters one of the outer terminals and exits the middle terminal, but the other outer terminal is actually tied to ground, which gives you a parallel, variable resistance path to ground. This parallel path acts to bleed current from the signal path, varying on how far you’ve turned the knob. In a guitar, to maximize the output volume, you turn the pot so that the signal passes from the outer terminal to the middle terminal with “no” resistance, and very little of the signal is bled to ground through the maximum-resistance parallel path. To lower the volume of the signal, you turn the pot so that some of the signal will pass through some resistance, and more and more of the signal bleeds to ground as the parallel path resistance is lowered. For zero volume, you turn the pot so that the signal path to the output jack faces a huge series resistance, and the parallel path to ground has no resistance, which causes all of the signal to bleed to ground.

With passive pickups, the potentiometer values for the controls are usually pretty high 250kOhm -> 500kOhm. Passive pickups have lower current outputs, so you have to be extra careful with power bleed as the signal travels from the pickup to the amp. As you bleed current, the signal power gets lower and lower, and more and more noise can begin to play a role in the signal. Active pickups, such as EMGs, normally work with with much lower-valued 25kOhm pots. There are probably many reasons for this, which I will attempt to describe… An EMG pickup is internally powered and the pickup output is boosted, so it can afford to work with a lower-valued bleed path because you’re not as concerned with losing precious signal current. With a passive pickup, you want a very large resistance in the bleed path, so that you bleed as little current as possible when you’re set to maximum volume. In an ideal world, using a huge resistor is great, but with real potentiometers, value tolerances and part “performance” can degrade as you work with parts of higher and higher resistance values. Most electronic components are manufactured with some sort of value tolerance, maybe 5% or 10%. With a resistor, this means that if the part is listed as 500kOhm, the resistance is actually some random value between 475kOhm and 525kOhm (500k plus/minus 5%). With an even larger value, like 1MegaOhm, the actual value will be somewhere between 950k and 1.5M. You can see that as the resistance value gets larger, the range of actual values gets larger as well. This might not seem like a problem, since we’re working with a variable resistor anyway, but the part “performance” can also degrade with larger resistance values. With a larger pot, the resistance sweep has a much wider range to cover, so there is a greater chance that the pot will will have undesired spikes, hot-spots, or undesigned variances in the value sweep. I also read somewhere that high-valued pots tend to have a spiky response to high frequencies. I’m not sure if that’s a specific characteristic of the pot hardware, or just a result of the inherent capacitance of any electronic component paired with a very large resistor.

The circuitry in the EMGs is probably tuned very carefully to work with a specific output “load,” so they probably try to use the lower pot values to get the better value tolerances, and maybe a “smoother” sweep from zero to maximum resistance. Another thing I learned is that pots can have different “sweep” (or “taper”) characteristics. You can get a pot with a linear sweep, where the resistance value increases linearly as you turn the knob, or you can also get an “audio potentiometer,” which has a non-linear  (logarithmic) sweep, which gives you more fine-grained control as you get to higher volumes. For example, with a linear pot, when you turn the knob to 50%, you’ll get 50% of the volume. With an audio pot, there is a logarithmic sweep, which means if you turn the knob to 20%, you might actually get 50% of the volume, but the remaining 80% of the pot turn is available to finely adjust the upper 50% of volume.

Anyway, I hope that wasn’t too boring, but I thought it was interesting. Here are a few more pictures. This one shows the control cavity. You can see the wires coming in from the pickup cavity - the cable from the toggle switch, and the two braided cables from the pickups.

Old controls closeup

The Explorer has 2 volume knobs (one for each pickup) and a “master” tone knob, which affects both pickups. The pot on the left is the neck volume, the middle one is the bridge volume, and the right one is the tone control. The tone control is another pot, but instead of a bleed resistor, it acts as a simple low-pass filter with a variable resistor and a capacitor. The capacitor sits across one of the resistor terminals and ground - it’s that round, orange thing soldered on the right pot.

Here’s a closeup of the left side:

Left control (neck volume)

The Explorer control placement is a little confusing in terms of the signal path. The pickup signal comes down through the braided wire through the volume pot, then gets routed back up to the toggle switch, and if the switch is in the right position for that pickup, the signal comes back down from the toggle switch, through the tone filter and finally out the output jack. One other interesting thing in this picture is the “string ground” wire. Near the top-right of the picture, you can see a silver wire that goes up into a little hole. This wire is tied to the ground of the controls (which are ultimately grounded by the amp, via the guitar cable), and apparently is connected somehow to the screws that hold the bridge piece. The bridge piece connects to the strings, which effectively grounds the entire guitar, strings and all. I read that if the strings are not grounded like this, there is a potential electric shock hazard. EMGs are internally grounded, so the EMG instructions say that you shouldn’t connect this ground wire when you replace the controls. To be honest, I don’t completely understand this, but oh well… I ended up just taping the wire up to the inside of the cavity with electrical tape when I took out the controls.

Here are some blurry closeups of the middle and right controls:

Middle control (bridge volume)

Here’s the tone control:

Right control (tone)

The black cable near the bottom connects down to the output jack.

That’s definitely enough for one post, thanks for reading!

EMG Pickup Installation in a Gibson Explorer (part 2)

Here’s my first real post on my project to install EMGs in a Gibson Explorer. I got this Explorer a few years ago after my apartment got broken into. I got some insurance money for the stuff that was stolen, so I figured I’d get a new guitar, rather than replace crappy DVDs. I’d always wanted a Gibson Explorer, mostly because of James Hetfield of Metallica, and more recently Claudio Sanchez of Coheed & Cambria, but also because it’s a frickin’ sweet axe! I got kind of a low-end Explorer model, which meant that the included hardware wasn’t exactly high-quality. After a few years of playing, the volume knobs started getting a little scratchy, so this was as good a guitar as any to overhaul.

I got the EMG “Zakk Wylde” pickup pack, which includes an EMG-81 and an EMG-85. People usually put the 81 in the bridge position and the 85 in the neck position. I could pretend like I know exactly why these two pickups are different, but alas, I guess I just don’t care enough to delve down to that level of detail. I did read that the 85 actually has a higher overall output than the 81, but produces a “warmer” tone, possibly because the pickups use different types of magnets. On a guitar, the neck pickup “slot” produces a warmer tone anyway, because of its positioning further down the string, so the 85 is a good fit for the neck spot. The 81 has a high output as well, but has a “less warm” frequency response (mid frequencies filtered out a bit more) which is good for boosting the highs and lows of the more “focused” string vibrations over the bridge spot. A lot of people go with this 81/85 combination, but I’ve also heard of people using two 85s, or two 81s instead. Since this is my first time, I figured it wouldn’t really matter because it’s all new to me.

Here’s the first step in the process - remove the pickguard:

Remove the pickguard

Here’s a closeup, you can see the toggle switch and its wires, and the braided wires coming from the old pickups:

Remove the pickguard closeup

Here’s the step I probably should have done first - remove the rusty old strings:

Remove the strings

With the strings off, the tailpiece and the “tune-o-matic” bridge aren’t attached to anything, so they might just fall off if you flip the guitar over. Be careful with the screws that hold the tune-o-matic, if these are mistakenly screwed up or down, your string height/action will change, which will create for some annoying adjustments later. Speaking of the tune-o-matic, there’s actually something you can do with this thing if you’re having intonation problems with your guitar, which was the case for me. If your string lengths are not set correctly, the guitar may sound out-of-tune at higher frets, even if you have the open strings tuned perfectly. For example if you tune an open string correctly, and then press down at the 12th fret and find that you’re sharp or flat, it means that your string is either too short or too long. This can be easily adjusted with a tune-o-matic - each string has its own “saddle” that can be moved back and forth with a little screw. In my case, I was having the “sharp-at-the-12th-fret” problem, which meant that my string was too short. I moved the saddle as far as I could to lengthen the string, but unfortunately, I hit the limit on how far I could move it back, and the string was still sharp at 12. Luckily, the saddles are shaped like a little angled wedge, and the factory setup is for the wedge to slope up from the bridge towards the neck. (I hope that makes sense.) Anyway, I found that you can flip the saddles around so that the wedge slopes up from the neck towards the bridge. Flipping the saddle basically moves the string contact point back 2mm or so, and gives you a little more room to screw the saddle back even further, if the 2mm change is not enough. Here’s a nice, blurry picture showing a few of the saddles flipped around. I don’t know if it’s really clear, but it actually helped, in the end, I was able to achieve better intonation.

Tune-o-matic closeup with flipped saddles

It’s hard to see, but the two on the left have been flipped around, and the 3rd one from the left is screwed all the way forward - I’m about to take it out to flip it around. This was just a little side-thing to do while I had everything dismantled.

This is probably enough for one post, but I’ll post a few more blogs with more pictures.